12 Responses to “Immappancy; Or, Africa Is A Continent”
Leave a Reply
Recent Comments
 | Brianne Gallagher on What We Talked About At ISA: T… |
 | Pablo K on What We Talked About At ISA: C… |
| Re-blogged: Critical… on What We Talked About At ISA: C… | |
 | rodsjournal on What We Talked About At ISA: C… |
 | Jon Herington on What We Talked About At ISA: T… |
 | syndaxvuzz on What We Talked About At ISA: T… |
 | Joe on What We Talked About At ISA: T… |
 | Jon Herington on What We Talked About At ISA: T… |
 | Adam Humphreys on What We Talked About At ISA: C… |
 | teknokraten on What We Talked About At ISA: T… |
Recent Selections from Our Complete & Utter Works
Pablo, 'Refusing to be a Man?: Men’s Responsibility for War Rape and the Problem of Social Structures in Feminist and Gender Theory', Men and Masculinities, OnlineFirst, 2013
Pablo, 'How Is Rape A Weapon Of War?: Feminist International Relations, Modes of Critical Explanation and the Study of Wartime Sexual Violence', European Journal of International Relations, OnlineFirst, 2012
Joe, 'Rereading the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Plurality and Contestation, not Consensus', Journal of Human Rights, forthcoming, 2013
Joe, 'Towards a Politics for Human Rights: Ambiguous Humanity and Democratizing Rights', Philosophy and Social Criticism, forthcoming, 2013
Meera, 'Avatars of Eurocentrism in the Critique of the Liberal Peace', Security Dialogue, 44(3), 2013
Meera, 'IR In Dialogue ... But Can We Change the Subjects? A Typology of Decolonising Strategies for the Study of World Politics', Millennium, 39(3), 2011
Nick, The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism (edited with Levi Bryant and Graham Harman), re.press, 2011
Nick, 'Conflict Networks: Collapsing the Global into the Local', Journal of Critical Globalisation Studies, 2, 2010
Srdjan, The Anglosphere: A Genealogy of a Racialized Identity in International Relations, Stanford University Press, 2011
Srdjan, 'A Racialized Peace? How Britain and the US Made Their Relationship Special', Foreign Policy Analysis, 7(3), 2011
Antoine, The Scientific Way Of Warfare: Order & Chaos on the Battlefields of Modernity, Hurst & Co., 2009
Antoine, 'Beyond Models and Metaphors: Complexity Theory, Systems Thinking and International Relations' (with Simon Curtis), Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 24(1), 2011
Robbie, German Thought & International Relations: The Rise & Fall of a Liberal Project, Palgrave Macmillan, 2009
Robbie, 'Decolonising the Grounds of Ethical Inquiry: A Dialogue Between Kant, Foucault and Glissant', Millennium, 39(3), 2011
Rahul, Third World Protest: Between Home and the World, Oxford University Press, 2010
Rahul, 'Disciplining Cosmopolitanism', Transnational Legal Theory, 1(3), 2010
Wanda, Volunteer Tourism in the Global South: Giving Back in Neoliberal TImes, Routledge, 2012
Wanda, '"Caring" Capitalism and the Duplicity of Critique', Theory and Event, 14(4), 2011
IR & Its Discontents
The Duck Of Minerva
David Campbell
The Bodies Politic
Robbie Shilliam
Geographical Imaginations
#OccupyIRTheory
Theory Talks
Justice in Conflict
zunguzungu
Congo Siasa
Texas In Africa
Wronging Rights
Mats Utas
The Gender and War Project
Hand Relief International
Grand Blog Tarkin
Biospheric Harm Aesthetics
Restricted Data
Aid Watch
The Black Atlantic
Conflict Health
iRevolution
Immanuel Wallerstein
Juan Cole
Stephen M. Walt
Martin Coward
Richard Jackson
Historical Sociology & IR
Fanon/Deleuze
Millennium
Journal of Critical Globalisation Studies
LSE IR Dept Blog
Social Theory
K-Punk
Infinite ThØught
Speculative Heresy
Bad Reputation
London Review of Books
Crooked Timber
Nigel Dodd's Money Blog
Understanding Society
Sociological Images
Critical Legal Thinking
Critical Education
Exquisite Life Research Blogs
Social Text
Future Thoughts
Leiter Reports
Feminist Philosophers
The Contemporary Condition
Voyou Desoeuvre
Institute for Conjunctural Research
Abandoned Footnotes
Radicals
Lenin's Tomb
China Mieville
Feministe
Glenn Greenwald
Adam Curtis
Wu Ming
Left Foot Forward
Inequalities
19th Brumaire
Paul Mason
Doug Henwood
Gin and Tacos
Friends
Charlotte Richardson Andrews
A Can Opener in a Worm Factory
Apple Jackson
Orgs & Resources
Aaaaarg.org
Campaign for the Public University
Universities in Crisis
wonkhe
Education Activists Network
The Really Open University
Liberty
Index On Censorship
Open Rights Group
Backdoor Broadcasting Company
Throw Away Your Telescreen!
ZNet
Bretton Woods Project
Development Data
Dictionary of War
Header art adapted from Diego Rivera, Gerard ter Borch, Jean-Michel Basquiat, Kent Monkman, Pieter Bruegel, Emmanuel Leutze, Ron English, MacDonald 'Max' Gill, and Jack Kirby.
Our work, whether individually or collectively, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
But Russia, Canada, Argentina and Norway have it about covered. I find it surprising that there are so many countries packed into such a limited area, and doubly surprising that so few people live there.
Well, Argentina has also been somewhat short-changed in the past. It’s just as illuminating to look at a Gall-Peters projection of the world – http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/77/Gall-peters.jpg – (correct for area) since what we are used to seeing as a world map is based on a form of projection which increases the apparent size of countries distant from the equator.
I prefer to think of the Mapuche indians as the real losers in that particular process. It is an interesting map, but I think I saw my first Peter’s projection in about 1991, and I suppose I’m just surprised that the discourse of cartographical marginalisation keeps coming around again and again.
Furthermore, if it is purely a cartographical issue, then why aren’t we horrified to find that Antarctica is very often excluded altogether. I’m not even sure that it is all properly mapped! Quite shocking.
Aren’t you becoming quite the academic troll (http://k-punk.abstractdynamics.org/archives/011172.html )?
I was seven for almost all of 1991, which may be why I didn’t catch the meme back then. Although I don’t recognise the critique of immappancy as being sufficiently widespread to constitute anything so total as a ‘discourse’, my semi-educated guess would be that people have mentioned it more than once because they keep discovering it afresh.
No one mentioned horror, still less identified this as the epiphenomenal expression of naughty Western imperialism or an interesting footnote in the annals of geometrical transformation.
Youth, like ignorance, is no defence.
more seriously, I don’t honestly imagine that the marginalisation of Africa has anything to do with people not having a clear estimation of just how big it is. I tend to think that people not understanding how big Africa is has something to do with its relative marginalisation. And I don’t think size matters, much.
Who said otherwise? Stop shadow-boxing straw men.
Well, if you could enumerate everything you know for us, we’ll make sure not to impose any more of our redundant opinions and naïve discoveries on you.
On the question of straw men: It seems strongly implied by the fact that the map was produced at all, and that it is entitled ‘The True Size of Africa’. But maybe I’m reading more into than I should. You also posted it without comment, from which I infer that you think it speaks for itself.
On the question of imposition: I actually liked the map, I just thought it was interesting that these sort of maps are always accompanied by the thought that somehow this is new and surprising. And I thought you might find that interesting as well. I’m afraid my attempt to pose my thought in a vaguely humorous and off hand way came across as a bit patronising, perhaps. But it was meant only with the greatest of respect.
Do I think that there’s some kind of relationship between immappancy and the contemporary political situation of Africa? Yes. That much you read entirely correctly. Does it follow that I think that ‘not knowing how big Africa is’ is implicated as a cause of its marginalisation, rather than vice versa? No.
So few people live there? It has the second highest population of any continent and a higher population density than North America. If they did not have the death rates of children that they do, they would likely be much more populated than Asia.